K10 · bounded transition and assurance evidence
Cross-System Assurance Dashboard
Direct answer
The K10 dashboard derives 12 system states from static datasets. It reports zero deployed and zero operating systems and preserves degraded, stale, unavailable, and unknown evidence states.
Claim-level evidence boundary
VERIFIED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
Dashboard states remain distinct
The K10 assurance dashboard does not infer deployment or operation from described architecture, implemented tooling, or test evidence.
The dashboard is a release-time static derivation, not live telemetry.
State inventory
Systems
TESTED
Fuþorc protocol negotiation harness
Synthetic conformance only.
IMPLEMENTED
History primary-source review queue
Queue exists; reviews remain unperformed.
TESTED
Offline IDN observation history
No live network observation.
TESTED
Facility workbook migration and merge
Reference tooling; not a facility record system.
DEGRADED
Common-cause assurance analysis
Synthetic traces contain unresolved dependencies.
DEGRADED
Phased cryptographic transition plan
Not deployed; supplier and test dependencies remain.
IMPLEMENTED
Acquisition evaluation audit trail
Synthetic records; no award.
TESTED
Offline scheduler-result importer
No public scheduler or monitor.
TESTED
Evidence redaction and leakage tests
Static validation is not production access control.
UNKNOWN
Live-host verification
Deployment not performed; host not observed.
UNAVAILABLE
Independent named screen-reader validation
Environment not available; no pass manufactured.
DESCRIBED
Critical-datacenter protection system
Architecture and assurance model only; no deployed facility system.
Derivation boundary
The dashboard is generated from static, versioned K10 datasets. A page, tool, test, schema, or signed reference fixture cannot silently become deployed or operating evidence.
Runtime monitoring: NONE. Live host: NOT OBSERVED. Independent named screen-reader testing: NOT PERFORMED.