Report-finding claim register

Machine Intelligence Terminology and Ontology Registry: Canonical Definitions, Concept Boundaries, Semantic Relationships, and Machine-Readable Publication — Claim Register

Direct answer

This register publishes 12 stable finding claims for Machine Intelligence Terminology and Ontology Registry: Canonical Definitions, Concept Boundaries, Semantic Relationships, and Machine-Readable Publication (REP-K01-001, source machine-intelligence-ontology-registry-1.md) and preserves the source hash, finding order, claim status, visible owner anchors, and limitations.

Source provenance

Governed source identity
Report IDREP-K01-001
Raw source titleMachine Intelligence Terminology and Ontology Registry: Canonical Definitions, Concept Boundaries, Semantic Relationships, and Machine-Readable Publication
Source filenamemachine-intelligence-ontology-registry-1.md
Original filenameMachine Intelligence Ontology Registry(1).md
SHA-256bc0aed04ca6b36c662d39af01ba771a195b3f029acaa6dffb0ece20264025fd8
Visible synthesisReport page

Finding claims

Machine Intelligence Terminology and Ontology Registry: Canonical Definitions, Concept Boundaries, Semantic Relationships, and Machine-Readable Publication — finding 1

The report treats 1\. Metadata and Research-Status Front Matter as a distinct analytical area that must be evaluated separately from adjacent legal, technical, operational, or institutional claims.

Qualification: The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.

Support relationship

  • REP-K01-001 · 1\. Metadata and Research-Status Front Matter · GOVERNED REPORT FINDING

Machine Intelligence Terminology and Ontology Registry: Canonical Definitions, Concept Boundaries, Semantic Relationships, and Machine-Readable Publication — finding 2

The report treats 2\. Executive Terminology Brief as a distinct analytical area that must be evaluated separately from adjacent legal, technical, operational, or institutional claims.

Qualification: The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.

Support relationship

  • REP-K01-001 · 2\. Executive Terminology Brief · GOVERNED REPORT FINDING

Machine Intelligence Terminology and Ontology Registry: Canonical Definitions, Concept Boundaries, Semantic Relationships, and Machine-Readable Publication — finding 3

The report treats 3\. Editorial Principles as a distinct analytical area that must be evaluated separately from adjacent legal, technical, operational, or institutional claims.

Qualification: The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.

Support relationship

  • REP-K01-001 · 3\. Editorial Principles · GOVERNED REPORT FINDING

Machine Intelligence Terminology and Ontology Registry: Canonical Definitions, Concept Boundaries, Semantic Relationships, and Machine-Readable Publication — finding 4

The report treats 4\. Ontology Architecture as a distinct analytical area that must be evaluated separately from adjacent legal, technical, operational, or institutional claims.

Qualification: The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.

Support relationship

  • REP-K01-001 · 4\. Ontology Architecture · GOVERNED REPORT FINDING

Machine Intelligence Terminology and Ontology Registry: Canonical Definitions, Concept Boundaries, Semantic Relationships, and Machine-Readable Publication — finding 5

The report treats 5\. Complete Canonical Glossary as a distinct analytical area that must be evaluated separately from adjacent legal, technical, operational, or institutional claims.

Qualification: The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.

Support relationship

  • REP-K01-001 · 5\. Complete Canonical Glossary · GOVERNED REPORT FINDING

Machine Intelligence Terminology and Ontology Registry: Canonical Definitions, Concept Boundaries, Semantic Relationships, and Machine-Readable Publication — finding 6

The report treats Direct-Answer Table for AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) as a distinct analytical area that must be evaluated separately from adjacent legal, technical, operational, or institutional claims.

Qualification: The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.

Support relationship

  • REP-K01-001 · Direct-Answer Table for AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) · GOVERNED REPORT FINDING

Machine Intelligence Terminology and Ontology Registry: Canonical Definitions, Concept Boundaries, Semantic Relationships, and Machine-Readable Publication — finding 7

The source report identifies this proposition for governed review: Verification vs. Certification (RQ9): Engineering communities treat Verification as the internal, objective process of ensuring a system meets its design specifications3. Certification is the external legal or cryptographic attestation of that fact. Verification is the action; Certification is the artifact.

Qualification: The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.

Support relationship

  • REP-K01-001 · 6\. Contested-Term Analysis · GOVERNED REPORT FINDING

Machine Intelligence Terminology and Ontology Registry: Canonical Definitions, Concept Boundaries, Semantic Relationships, and Machine-Readable Publication — finding 8

The source report identifies this proposition for governed review: Identity vs. Credentials (RQ6): In security architecture (NIST SP 800-207A / SPIFFE), a Workload Identity is derived dynamically from verifiable facts about the workload (its runtime environment, hash, node) rather than a stored credential (a secret password or API key)7. Identity is inherent ("what the workload is"); a credential is transferable ("what it holds").

Qualification: The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.

Support relationship

  • REP-K01-001 · 7\. Deprecated and Prohibited Conflations · GOVERNED REPORT FINDING

Machine Intelligence Terminology and Ontology Registry: Canonical Definitions, Concept Boundaries, Semantic Relationships, and Machine-Readable Publication — finding 9

The source report identifies this proposition for governed review: Autonomy vs. Sovereignty (RQ10): Autonomy is a technical capability—the ability to execute programmatic loops and adapt to environments without continuous human prompting. Sovereignty is a legal and political status—the absolute authority over a domain. An autonomous drone possesses autonomy but entirely lacks legal sovereignty.

Qualification: The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.

Support relationship

  • REP-K01-001 · Preferred and Deprecated Synonyms · GOVERNED REPORT FINDING

Machine Intelligence Terminology and Ontology Registry: Canonical Definitions, Concept Boundaries, Semantic Relationships, and Machine-Readable Publication — finding 10

The source report identifies this proposition for governed review: MachineIntelligence \-\ hasIdentity \-\ WorkloadIdentity.

Qualification: The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.

Support relationship

  • REP-K01-001 · 8\. Legal Terminology · GOVERNED REPORT FINDING

Machine Intelligence Terminology and Ontology Registry: Canonical Definitions, Concept Boundaries, Semantic Relationships, and Machine-Readable Publication — finding 11

The source report identifies this proposition for governed review: MachineIntelligence \-\ executes \-\ Activity.

Qualification: The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.

Support relationship

  • REP-K01-001 · 9\. Technical Terminology · GOVERNED REPORT FINDING

Machine Intelligence Terminology and Ontology Registry: Canonical Definitions, Concept Boundaries, Semantic Relationships, and Machine-Readable Publication — finding 12

The source report identifies this proposition for governed review: MachineIntelligence \-\ possesses \-\ Capability.

Qualification: The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.

Support relationship

  • REP-K01-001 · 10\. Philosophical Terminology · GOVERNED REPORT FINDING