{
  "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/questions/what-is-the-minimum-cyber-boundary-between-reactor-and-datacenter/#clm-k04-q-092",
  "claimStatus": "PROJECT DOCTRINE",
  "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K04 STRATEGIC RECORD",
  "id": "CLM-K04-Q-092",
  "lastReviewed": "2026-08-15",
  "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k04-q-092.json",
  "name": "What is the minimum cyber boundary between a reactor and a datacenter?",
  "ownerAnchor": "clm-k04-q-092",
  "ownerId": "K04-Q-092",
  "ownerRoute": "/questions/what-is-the-minimum-cyber-boundary-between-reactor-and-datacenter/",
  "ownerType": "question",
  "proposition": "The exact design is licensing- and architecture-specific, but the baseline principle is that safety and protection functions must not depend on an unrestricted bidirectional path from the datacenter. Higher-consequence zones require deterministic flow control, separate identities, independent safety, and validated data mediation.",
  "qualification": "The answer remains bounded by the owning topic, exact authority, safety, jurisdiction, evidence, and readiness state.",
  "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
  "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
  "researchCutoff": "2026-08-15",
  "scope": "Direct answer for What is the minimum cyber boundary between a reactor and a datacenter?",
  "slug": "clm-k04-q-092",
  "sourceIds": [
    "SRC-GOOGLE-KAIROS-2024",
    "SRC-CONSTELLATION-MICROSOFT-2024",
    "SRC-CONSTELLATION-META-2025",
    "SRC-NRC-10CFR-73-54",
    "SRC-NRC-ADVANCED-REACTOR-PHYSICAL-SECURITY"
  ],
  "sourceSections": [
    {
      "section": "Agreement and timeline",
      "sourceId": "SRC-GOOGLE-KAIROS-2024",
      "supportRelationship": "QUALIFIES OR SUPPORTS WITHIN STATED SCOPE",
      "supports": "Google states that the agreement is intended to enable up to 500 MW of 24/7 carbon-free power, beginning with a first SMR targeted for 2030.",
      "url": "https://blog.google/company-news/outreach-and-initiatives/sustainability/google-kairos-power-nuclear-energy-agreement/"
    },
    {
      "section": "Agreement summary",
      "sourceId": "SRC-CONSTELLATION-MICROSOFT-2024",
      "supportRelationship": "QUALIFIES OR SUPPORTS WITHIN STATED SCOPE",
      "supports": "Constellation describes a 20-year Microsoft PPA supporting restart and approximately 835 MW of carbon-free grid output.",
      "url": "https://www.constellationenergy.com/news/2024/Constellation-to-Launch-Crane-Clean-Energy-Center-Restoring-Jobs-and-Carbon-Free-Power-to-The-Grid.html"
    },
    {
      "section": "Agreement summary",
      "sourceId": "SRC-CONSTELLATION-META-2025",
      "supportRelationship": "QUALIFIES OR SUPPORTS WITHIN STATED SCOPE",
      "supports": "Constellation and Meta announced a 20-year agreement for 1,121 MW of emissions-free nuclear output beginning in 2027.",
      "url": "https://www.constellationenergy.com/news/2025/constellation-meta-sign-20-year-deal-for-clean-reliable-nuclear-energy-in-illinois.html"
    },
    {
      "section": "73.54(a)",
      "sourceId": "SRC-NRC-10CFR-73-54",
      "supportRelationship": "QUALIFIES OR SUPPORTS WITHIN STATED SCOPE",
      "supports": "Covered licensees must provide high assurance that specified digital systems and networks are protected against cyber attacks up to and including the design basis threat.",
      "url": "https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-10/chapter-I/part-73/section-73.54"
    },
    {
      "section": "73.54(b)",
      "sourceId": "SRC-NRC-10CFR-73-54",
      "supportRelationship": "QUALIFIES OR SUPPORTS WITHIN STATED SCOPE",
      "supports": "The regulation requires asset analysis and an implemented and maintained cybersecurity program for protected assets.",
      "url": "https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-10/chapter-I/part-73/section-73.54"
    },
    {
      "section": "Alternative requirements overview",
      "sourceId": "SRC-NRC-ADVANCED-REACTOR-PHYSICAL-SECURITY",
      "supportRelationship": "QUALIFIES OR SUPPORTS WITHIN STATED SCOPE",
      "supports": "The NRC considered technology-inclusive, risk-informed, performance-based alternatives for advanced-reactor physical protection.",
      "url": "https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML2425/ML24254A350.pdf"
    },
    {
      "section": "Onsite responder alternatives",
      "sourceId": "SRC-NRC-ADVANCED-REACTOR-PHYSICAL-SECURITY",
      "supportRelationship": "QUALIFIES OR SUPPORTS WITHIN STATED SCOPE",
      "supports": "Supporting materials discuss conditions under which the minimum number of onsite armed responders could be reduced, including potentially to zero, subject to the rule and facility showing.",
      "url": "https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML2417/ML24178A370.pdf"
    }
  ],
  "type": "ClaimRecord"
}