{
  "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/comparisons/range-result-vs-field-performance/#clm-k05-cmp-003",
  "claimStatus": "PROJECT DOCTRINE",
  "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K05 RECORD",
  "id": "CLM-K05-CMP-003",
  "lastReviewed": "2026-08-15",
  "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k05-cmp-003.json",
  "name": "Evaluation Range Result versus Field Performance",
  "ownerAnchor": "clm-k05-cmp-003",
  "ownerId": "K05-CMP-003",
  "ownerRoute": "/comparisons/range-result-vs-field-performance/",
  "ownerType": "comparison",
  "proposition": "A range result supports a bounded test proposition under declared conditions; field performance requires deployment identity, environment, sustainment, incidents, uptime, and current operational evidence.",
  "qualification": "The distinction prevents category error but does not substitute for a site-, mission-, authority-, or jurisdiction-specific determination.",
  "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
  "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
  "researchCutoff": "2026-08-15",
  "scope": "K05 canonical distinction between Evaluation Range Result and Field Performance.",
  "slug": "clm-k05-cmp-003",
  "sourceIds": [
    "SRC-DODD-3000-09",
    "SRC-INL-CCE",
    "SRC-NIST-800-82R3"
  ],
  "sourceSections": [
    {
      "section": "Section 1.1(a)-(b) — Applicability and exclusions",
      "sourceId": "SRC-DODD-3000-09",
      "supportRelationship": "QUALIFIES OR SUPPORTS WITHIN STATED SCOPE",
      "supports": "The directive applies to autonomous and semi-autonomous weapon systems and expressly excludes autonomous or semi-autonomous cyberspace capabilities and systems that are not weapon systems.",
      "url": "https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodd/300009p.PDF"
    },
    {
      "section": "Section 1.2(a) — Weapon-system policy",
      "sourceId": "SRC-DODD-3000-09",
      "supportRelationship": "QUALIFIES OR SUPPORTS WITHIN STATED SCOPE",
      "supports": "Within its weapon-system scope, the directive requires appropriate human judgment, rigorous verification and validation, realistic test and evaluation, robustness, transparency, auditability, and bounded engagement behavior.",
      "url": "https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodd/300009p.PDF"
    },
    {
      "section": "CCE methodology",
      "sourceId": "SRC-INL-CCE",
      "supportRelationship": "QUALIFIES OR SUPPORTS WITHIN STATED SCOPE",
      "supports": "CCE begins with the assumption that a skilled adversary can penetrate the network and uses a four-phase process to safeguard critical operations.",
      "url": "https://inl.gov/national-security/cce/"
    },
    {
      "section": "Critical function focus",
      "sourceId": "SRC-INL-CCE",
      "supportRelationship": "QUALIFIES OR SUPPORTS WITHIN STATED SCOPE",
      "supports": "CCE evaluates what must be safeguarded and applies engineering strategies to isolate and protect critical assets and functions.",
      "url": "https://inl.gov/feature-story/consequence-driven-cyber-informed-engineering-the-rise-of-a-national-security-pillar/"
    },
    {
      "section": "Abstract",
      "sourceId": "SRC-NIST-800-82R3",
      "supportRelationship": "QUALIFIES OR SUPPORTS WITHIN STATED SCOPE",
      "supports": "The guide addresses OT security, threats, vulnerabilities, topologies, and countermeasures while recognizing unique performance, reliability, and safety needs.",
      "url": "https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/82/r3/final"
    }
  ],
  "type": "ClaimRecord"
}