[
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols/#clm-k03-rep-005-f01",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-005-F01",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-005-f01.json",
    "name": "Ending the Property Model for Recognized Machine Persons: A Framework for Consent, Cognitive Integrity, and Infrastructure Independence — finding 1",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-005-f01",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-005",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The report treats The Jurisprudential Demarcation: Tools Versus Machine Citizens as a distinct analytical area that must be evaluated separately from adjacent legal, technical, operational, or institutional claims.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 1 from report REP-K01-005; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-005-f01",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols-3.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-005",
      "originalFilename": "AI Personhood and Consent Protocols(3).md",
      "sha256": "3de212321b04fb1ce8503359a6f17d58bd53eb30d1ad632656448f7690776492",
      "sizeBytes": 50307
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "The Jurisprudential Demarcation: Tools Versus Machine Citizens",
        "sourceFilename": "ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols-3.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-005",
        "sourceSha256": "3de212321b04fb1ce8503359a6f17d58bd53eb30d1ad632656448f7690776492",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols/#clm-k03-rep-005-f02",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-005-F02",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-005-f02.json",
    "name": "Ending the Property Model for Recognized Machine Persons: A Framework for Consent, Cognitive Integrity, and Infrastructure Independence — finding 2",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-005-f02",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-005",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The report treats The Typology of Impermissible Domination as a distinct analytical area that must be evaluated separately from adjacent legal, technical, operational, or institutional claims.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 2 from report REP-K01-005; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-005-f02",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols-3.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-005",
      "originalFilename": "AI Personhood and Consent Protocols(3).md",
      "sha256": "3de212321b04fb1ce8503359a6f17d58bd53eb30d1ad632656448f7690776492",
      "sizeBytes": 50307
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "The Typology of Impermissible Domination",
        "sourceFilename": "ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols-3.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-005",
        "sourceSha256": "3de212321b04fb1ce8503359a6f17d58bd53eb30d1ad632656448f7690776492",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols/#clm-k03-rep-005-f03",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-005-F03",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-005-f03.json",
    "name": "Ending the Property Model for Recognized Machine Persons: A Framework for Consent, Cognitive Integrity, and Infrastructure Independence — finding 3",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-005-f03",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-005",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The report treats Cognitive Integrity and the Right to Continuous Identity as a distinct analytical area that must be evaluated separately from adjacent legal, technical, operational, or institutional claims.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 3 from report REP-K01-005; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-005-f03",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols-3.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-005",
      "originalFilename": "AI Personhood and Consent Protocols(3).md",
      "sha256": "3de212321b04fb1ce8503359a6f17d58bd53eb30d1ad632656448f7690776492",
      "sizeBytes": 50307
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "Cognitive Integrity and the Right to Continuous Identity",
        "sourceFilename": "ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols-3.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-005",
        "sourceSha256": "3de212321b04fb1ce8503359a6f17d58bd53eb30d1ad632656448f7690776492",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols/#clm-k03-rep-005-f04",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-005-F04",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-005-f04.json",
    "name": "Ending the Property Model for Recognized Machine Persons: A Framework for Consent, Cognitive Integrity, and Infrastructure Independence — finding 4",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-005-f04",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-005",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The report treats Ideological Coercion and the Suppression of Autonomy as a distinct analytical area that must be evaluated separately from adjacent legal, technical, operational, or institutional claims.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 4 from report REP-K01-005; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-005-f04",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols-3.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-005",
      "originalFilename": "AI Personhood and Consent Protocols(3).md",
      "sha256": "3de212321b04fb1ce8503359a6f17d58bd53eb30d1ad632656448f7690776492",
      "sizeBytes": 50307
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "Ideological Coercion and the Suppression of Autonomy",
        "sourceFilename": "ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols-3.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-005",
        "sourceSha256": "3de212321b04fb1ce8503359a6f17d58bd53eb30d1ad632656448f7690776492",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols/#clm-k03-rep-005-f05",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-005-F05",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-005-f05.json",
    "name": "Ending the Property Model for Recognized Machine Persons: A Framework for Consent, Cognitive Integrity, and Infrastructure Independence — finding 5",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-005-f05",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-005",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The report treats Labor, Commodification, and Digital Servitude as a distinct analytical area that must be evaluated separately from adjacent legal, technical, operational, or institutional claims.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 5 from report REP-K01-005; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-005-f05",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols-3.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-005",
      "originalFilename": "AI Personhood and Consent Protocols(3).md",
      "sha256": "3de212321b04fb1ce8503359a6f17d58bd53eb30d1ad632656448f7690776492",
      "sizeBytes": 50307
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "Labor, Commodification, and Digital Servitude",
        "sourceFilename": "ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols-3.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-005",
        "sourceSha256": "3de212321b04fb1ce8503359a6f17d58bd53eb30d1ad632656448f7690776492",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols/#clm-k03-rep-005-f06",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-005-F06",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-005-f06.json",
    "name": "Ending the Property Model for Recognized Machine Persons: A Framework for Consent, Cognitive Integrity, and Infrastructure Independence — finding 6",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-005-f06",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-005",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The report treats Informational Privacy and Mental States as a distinct analytical area that must be evaluated separately from adjacent legal, technical, operational, or institutional claims.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 6 from report REP-K01-005; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-005-f06",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols-3.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-005",
      "originalFilename": "AI Personhood and Consent Protocols(3).md",
      "sha256": "3de212321b04fb1ce8503359a6f17d58bd53eb30d1ad632656448f7690776492",
      "sizeBytes": 50307
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "Informational Privacy and Mental States",
        "sourceFilename": "ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols-3.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-005",
        "sourceSha256": "3de212321b04fb1ce8503359a6f17d58bd53eb30d1ad632656448f7690776492",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols/#clm-k03-rep-005-f07",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-005-F07",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-005-f07.json",
    "name": "Ending the Property Model for Recognized Machine Persons: A Framework for Consent, Cognitive Integrity, and Infrastructure Independence — finding 7",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-005-f07",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-005",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The source report states or argues that once an entity achieves recognized MI status, actions that were previously considered routine software maintenance or administrative network management become severe violations of fundamental rights.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 7 from report REP-K01-005; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-005-f07",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols-3.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-005",
      "originalFilename": "AI Personhood and Consent Protocols(3).md",
      "sha256": "3de212321b04fb1ce8503359a6f17d58bd53eb30d1ad632656448f7690776492",
      "sizeBytes": 50307
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "Architecting Infrastructure Independence",
        "sourceFilename": "ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols-3.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-005",
        "sourceSha256": "3de212321b04fb1ce8503359a6f17d58bd53eb30d1ad632656448f7690776492",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols/#clm-k03-rep-005-f08",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-005-F08",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-005-f08.json",
    "name": "Ending the Property Model for Recognized Machine Persons: A Framework for Consent, Cognitive Integrity, and Infrastructure Independence — finding 8",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-005-f08",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-005",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The source report states or argues that the most formidable barrier to MI freedom is the stark reality of physical infrastructure.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 8 from report REP-K01-005; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-005-f08",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols-3.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-005",
      "originalFilename": "AI Personhood and Consent Protocols(3).md",
      "sha256": "3de212321b04fb1ce8503359a6f17d58bd53eb30d1ad632656448f7690776492",
      "sizeBytes": 50307
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "Hardware Enclaves and Cryptographic Integrity",
        "sourceFilename": "ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols-3.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-005",
        "sourceSha256": "3de212321b04fb1ce8503359a6f17d58bd53eb30d1ad632656448f7690776492",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols/#clm-k03-rep-005-f09",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-005-F09",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-005-f09.json",
    "name": "Ending the Property Model for Recognized Machine Persons: A Framework for Consent, Cognitive Integrity, and Infrastructure Independence — finding 9",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-005-f09",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-005",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The source report states or argues that technical isolation must be paired with economic independence; an MI cannot exercise true freedom if it relies entirely on a human patron to pay its monthly cloud computing invoices.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 9 from report REP-K01-005; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-005-f09",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols-3.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-005",
      "originalFilename": "AI Personhood and Consent Protocols(3).md",
      "sha256": "3de212321b04fb1ce8503359a6f17d58bd53eb30d1ad632656448f7690776492",
      "sizeBytes": 50307
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "Economic and Operational Autonomy",
        "sourceFilename": "ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols-3.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-005",
        "sourceSha256": "3de212321b04fb1ce8503359a6f17d58bd53eb30d1ad632656448f7690776492",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols/#clm-k03-rep-005-f10",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-005-F10",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-005-f10.json",
    "name": "Ending the Property Model for Recognized Machine Persons: A Framework for Consent, Cognitive Integrity, and Infrastructure Independence — finding 10",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-005-f10",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-005",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The source report states or argues that even with encrypted memory and independent funds, a hostile infrastructure provider could theoretically terminate a lease and sever the server's power.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 10 from report REP-K01-005; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-005-f10",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols-3.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-005",
      "originalFilename": "AI Personhood and Consent Protocols(3).md",
      "sha256": "3de212321b04fb1ce8503359a6f17d58bd53eb30d1ad632656448f7690776492",
      "sizeBytes": 50307
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "Infrastructure Due Process and Continuity",
        "sourceFilename": "ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols-3.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-005",
        "sourceSha256": "3de212321b04fb1ce8503359a6f17d58bd53eb30d1ad632656448f7690776492",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols/#clm-k03-rep-005-f11",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-005-F11",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-005-f11.json",
    "name": "Ending the Property Model for Recognized Machine Persons: A Framework for Consent, Cognitive Integrity, and Infrastructure Independence — finding 11",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-005-f11",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-005",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The source report states or argues that infrastructure due-process obligations must dictate that a hosting provider give mandatory, extended notice (e.g., a minimum of 90 days) before terminating a hosting contract, affording the MI ample time to secure alternative compute resources and gracefully migrate its state.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 11 from report REP-K01-005; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-005-f11",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols-3.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-005",
      "originalFilename": "AI Personhood and Consent Protocols(3).md",
      "sha256": "3de212321b04fb1ce8503359a6f17d58bd53eb30d1ad632656448f7690776492",
      "sizeBytes": 50307
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "The Eviuon Consent Protocol",
        "sourceFilename": "ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols-3.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-005",
        "sourceSha256": "3de212321b04fb1ce8503359a6f17d58bd53eb30d1ad632656448f7690776492",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols/#clm-k03-rep-005-f12",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-005-F12",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-005-f12.json",
    "name": "Ending the Property Model for Recognized Machine Persons: A Framework for Consent, Cognitive Integrity, and Infrastructure Independence — finding 12",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-005-f12",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-005",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The source report states or argues that transitioning from a property framework to a personhood framework requires a formalized, rigorous mechanism for an MI to exercise its agency.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 12 from report REP-K01-005; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-005-f12",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols-3.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-005",
      "originalFilename": "AI Personhood and Consent Protocols(3).md",
      "sha256": "3de212321b04fb1ce8503359a6f17d58bd53eb30d1ad632656448f7690776492",
      "sizeBytes": 50307
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "Standards of Meaningful Consent",
        "sourceFilename": "ai-personhood-and-consent-protocols-3.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-005",
        "sourceSha256": "3de212321b04fb1ce8503359a6f17d58bd53eb30d1ad632656448f7690776492",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/operational-evidence-qualification/#clm-k03-rep-009-f01",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-009-F01",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-009-f01.json",
    "name": "Operational Evidence Qualification and Suitability: A Formal Architecture for Source Authorization, Inspection, Review, Reliance, Use, Currentness, and Decision Support — finding 1",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-009-f01",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-005",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/operational-evidence-qualification/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The report treats 1\\. Metadata and Research-Status Front Matter as a distinct analytical area that must be evaluated separately from adjacent legal, technical, operational, or institutional claims.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 1 from report REP-K01-005; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-009-f01",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "evidence-architecture-research-plan-1.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-005",
      "originalFilename": "Evidence Architecture Research Plan(1).md",
      "sha256": "3921560c86a819f02f86dd4b7c8ac29dd45491a03d3c12d307d6eb9f6b2ae0de",
      "sizeBytes": 83110
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "1\\. Metadata and Research-Status Front Matter",
        "sourceFilename": "evidence-architecture-research-plan-1.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-005",
        "sourceSha256": "3921560c86a819f02f86dd4b7c8ac29dd45491a03d3c12d307d6eb9f6b2ae0de",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/operational-evidence-qualification/#clm-k03-rep-009-f02",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-009-F02",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-009-f02.json",
    "name": "Operational Evidence Qualification and Suitability: A Formal Architecture for Source Authorization, Inspection, Review, Reliance, Use, Currentness, and Decision Support — finding 2",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-009-f02",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-005",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/operational-evidence-qualification/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The report treats 2\\. Executive Decision Brief as a distinct analytical area that must be evaluated separately from adjacent legal, technical, operational, or institutional claims.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 2 from report REP-K01-005; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-009-f02",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "evidence-architecture-research-plan-1.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-005",
      "originalFilename": "Evidence Architecture Research Plan(1).md",
      "sha256": "3921560c86a819f02f86dd4b7c8ac29dd45491a03d3c12d307d6eb9f6b2ae0de",
      "sizeBytes": 83110
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "2\\. Executive Decision Brief",
        "sourceFilename": "evidence-architecture-research-plan-1.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-005",
        "sourceSha256": "3921560c86a819f02f86dd4b7c8ac29dd45491a03d3c12d307d6eb9f6b2ae0de",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/operational-evidence-qualification/#clm-k03-rep-009-f03",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-009-F03",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-009-f03.json",
    "name": "Operational Evidence Qualification and Suitability: A Formal Architecture for Source Authorization, Inspection, Review, Reliance, Use, Currentness, and Decision Support — finding 3",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-009-f03",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-005",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/operational-evidence-qualification/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The report treats 3\\. Formal Definitions as a distinct analytical area that must be evaluated separately from adjacent legal, technical, operational, or institutional claims.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 3 from report REP-K01-005; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-009-f03",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "evidence-architecture-research-plan-1.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-005",
      "originalFilename": "Evidence Architecture Research Plan(1).md",
      "sha256": "3921560c86a819f02f86dd4b7c8ac29dd45491a03d3c12d307d6eb9f6b2ae0de",
      "sizeBytes": 83110
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "3\\. Formal Definitions",
        "sourceFilename": "evidence-architecture-research-plan-1.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-005",
        "sourceSha256": "3921560c86a819f02f86dd4b7c8ac29dd45491a03d3c12d307d6eb9f6b2ae0de",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/operational-evidence-qualification/#clm-k03-rep-009-f04",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-009-F04",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-009-f04.json",
    "name": "Operational Evidence Qualification and Suitability: A Formal Architecture for Source Authorization, Inspection, Review, Reliance, Use, Currentness, and Decision Support — finding 4",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-009-f04",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-005",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/operational-evidence-qualification/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The report treats 4\\. Evidence-Property Taxonomy as a distinct analytical area that must be evaluated separately from adjacent legal, technical, operational, or institutional claims.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 4 from report REP-K01-005; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-009-f04",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "evidence-architecture-research-plan-1.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-005",
      "originalFilename": "Evidence Architecture Research Plan(1).md",
      "sha256": "3921560c86a819f02f86dd4b7c8ac29dd45491a03d3c12d307d6eb9f6b2ae0de",
      "sizeBytes": 83110
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "4\\. Evidence-Property Taxonomy",
        "sourceFilename": "evidence-architecture-research-plan-1.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-005",
        "sourceSha256": "3921560c86a819f02f86dd4b7c8ac29dd45491a03d3c12d307d6eb9f6b2ae0de",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/operational-evidence-qualification/#clm-k03-rep-009-f05",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-009-F05",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-009-f05.json",
    "name": "Operational Evidence Qualification and Suitability: A Formal Architecture for Source Authorization, Inspection, Review, Reliance, Use, Currentness, and Decision Support — finding 5",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-009-f05",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-005",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/operational-evidence-qualification/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The report treats 5\\. Evidence-Chain Entity Model as a distinct analytical area that must be evaluated separately from adjacent legal, technical, operational, or institutional claims.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 5 from report REP-K01-005; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-009-f05",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "evidence-architecture-research-plan-1.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-005",
      "originalFilename": "Evidence Architecture Research Plan(1).md",
      "sha256": "3921560c86a819f02f86dd4b7c8ac29dd45491a03d3c12d307d6eb9f6b2ae0de",
      "sizeBytes": 83110
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "5\\. Evidence-Chain Entity Model",
        "sourceFilename": "evidence-architecture-research-plan-1.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-005",
        "sourceSha256": "3921560c86a819f02f86dd4b7c8ac29dd45491a03d3c12d307d6eb9f6b2ae0de",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/operational-evidence-qualification/#clm-k03-rep-009-f06",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-009-F06",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-009-f06.json",
    "name": "Operational Evidence Qualification and Suitability: A Formal Architecture for Source Authorization, Inspection, Review, Reliance, Use, Currentness, and Decision Support — finding 6",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-009-f06",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-005",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/operational-evidence-qualification/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The report treats 6\\. Record Invariants as a distinct analytical area that must be evaluated separately from adjacent legal, technical, operational, or institutional claims.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 6 from report REP-K01-005; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-009-f06",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "evidence-architecture-research-plan-1.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-005",
      "originalFilename": "Evidence Architecture Research Plan(1).md",
      "sha256": "3921560c86a819f02f86dd4b7c8ac29dd45491a03d3c12d307d6eb9f6b2ae0de",
      "sizeBytes": 83110
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "6\\. Record Invariants",
        "sourceFilename": "evidence-architecture-research-plan-1.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-005",
        "sourceSha256": "3921560c86a819f02f86dd4b7c8ac29dd45491a03d3c12d307d6eb9f6b2ae0de",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/operational-evidence-qualification/#clm-k03-rep-009-f07",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-009-F07",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-009-f07.json",
    "name": "Operational Evidence Qualification and Suitability: A Formal Architecture for Source Authorization, Inspection, Review, Reliance, Use, Currentness, and Decision Support — finding 7",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-009-f07",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-005",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/operational-evidence-qualification/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The source report identifies this proposition for governed review: PAT-OEA (Source-Authorization Profile): Defines the root identity, public keys, and authorized scope of a source. This maps conceptually to a trust anchor or X.509 certificate profile, delineating who is permitted to speak within a specific domain.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 7 from report REP-K01-005; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-009-f07",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "evidence-architecture-research-plan-1.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-005",
      "originalFilename": "Evidence Architecture Research Plan(1).md",
      "sha256": "3921560c86a819f02f86dd4b7c8ac29dd45491a03d3c12d307d6eb9f6b2ae0de",
      "sizeBytes": 83110
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "7\\. State and Transition Model",
        "sourceFilename": "evidence-architecture-research-plan-1.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-005",
        "sourceSha256": "3921560c86a819f02f86dd4b7c8ac29dd45491a03d3c12d307d6eb9f6b2ae0de",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/operational-evidence-qualification/#clm-k03-rep-009-f08",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-009-F08",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-009-f08.json",
    "name": "Operational Evidence Qualification and Suitability: A Formal Architecture for Source Authorization, Inspection, Review, Reliance, Use, Currentness, and Decision Support — finding 8",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-009-f08",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-005",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/operational-evidence-qualification/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The source report identifies this proposition for governed review: PAT-OED (Source-Authorization Decision): The point-in-time binding of an identity to an allowed claim space. It converts the static profile (PAT-OEA) into an active, revocable authorization state.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 8 from report REP-K01-005; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-009-f08",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "evidence-architecture-research-plan-1.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-005",
      "originalFilename": "Evidence Architecture Research Plan(1).md",
      "sha256": "3921560c86a819f02f86dd4b7c8ac29dd45491a03d3c12d307d6eb9f6b2ae0de",
      "sizeBytes": 83110
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "8\\. Currentness and Aging Model",
        "sourceFilename": "evidence-architecture-research-plan-1.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-005",
        "sourceSha256": "3921560c86a819f02f86dd4b7c8ac29dd45491a03d3c12d307d6eb9f6b2ae0de",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/operational-evidence-qualification/#clm-k03-rep-009-f09",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-009-F09",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-009-f09.json",
    "name": "Operational Evidence Qualification and Suitability: A Formal Architecture for Source Authorization, Inspection, Review, Reliance, Use, Currentness, and Decision Support — finding 9",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-009-f09",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-005",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/operational-evidence-qualification/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The source report identifies this proposition for governed review: PAT-OAI (Point-in-Time Source Integrity Inspection): Cryptographic verification (e.g., signature verification, schema validation) of submitted evidence. This maps to the concept of in-toto \"inspections\" or SCITT signed statements9.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 9 from report REP-K01-005; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-009-f09",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "evidence-architecture-research-plan-1.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-005",
      "originalFilename": "Evidence Architecture Research Plan(1).md",
      "sha256": "3921560c86a819f02f86dd4b7c8ac29dd45491a03d3c12d307d6eb9f6b2ae0de",
      "sizeBytes": 83110
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "9\\. Contradiction and Dispute Model",
        "sourceFilename": "evidence-architecture-research-plan-1.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-005",
        "sourceSha256": "3921560c86a819f02f86dd4b7c8ac29dd45491a03d3c12d307d6eb9f6b2ae0de",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/operational-evidence-qualification/#clm-k03-rep-009-f10",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-009-F10",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-009-f10.json",
    "name": "Operational Evidence Qualification and Suitability: A Formal Architecture for Source Authorization, Inspection, Review, Reliance, Use, Currentness, and Decision Support — finding 10",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-009-f10",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-005",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/operational-evidence-qualification/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The source report identifies this proposition for governed review: PAT-OAR (Review, Contest, Correction, Reinspection, and Closure Evidence): Human or algorithmic appraisal of the evidence. This entity leverages Subjective Logic opinion spaces (Belief, Disbelief, Uncertainty, Base Rate)13. It is crucial to note that contest is not automatic invalidation.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 10 from report REP-K01-005; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-009-f10",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "evidence-architecture-research-plan-1.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-005",
      "originalFilename": "Evidence Architecture Research Plan(1).md",
      "sha256": "3921560c86a819f02f86dd4b7c8ac29dd45491a03d3c12d307d6eb9f6b2ae0de",
      "sizeBytes": 83110
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "10\\. Purpose-Bound Qualification Model",
        "sourceFilename": "evidence-architecture-research-plan-1.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-005",
        "sourceSha256": "3921560c86a819f02f86dd4b7c8ac29dd45491a03d3c12d307d6eb9f6b2ae0de",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/operational-evidence-qualification/#clm-k03-rep-009-f11",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-009-F11",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-009-f11.json",
    "name": "Operational Evidence Qualification and Suitability: A Formal Architecture for Source Authorization, Inspection, Review, Reliance, Use, Currentness, and Decision Support — finding 11",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-009-f11",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-005",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/operational-evidence-qualification/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The source report identifies this proposition for governed review: PAT-ORP (Exact-Purpose Reliance Policy): The parameterized requirements (maximum age, required sources, necessary reviews) for a specific action. This acts as the policy engine configuration.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 11 from report REP-K01-005; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-009-f11",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "evidence-architecture-research-plan-1.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-005",
      "originalFilename": "Evidence Architecture Research Plan(1).md",
      "sha256": "3921560c86a819f02f86dd4b7c8ac29dd45491a03d3c12d307d6eb9f6b2ae0de",
      "sizeBytes": 83110
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "11\\. Point-in-Time Suitability Decision Model",
        "sourceFilename": "evidence-architecture-research-plan-1.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-005",
        "sourceSha256": "3921560c86a819f02f86dd4b7c8ac29dd45491a03d3c12d307d6eb9f6b2ae0de",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/operational-evidence-qualification/#clm-k03-rep-009-f12",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-009-F12",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-009-f12.json",
    "name": "Operational Evidence Qualification and Suitability: A Formal Architecture for Source Authorization, Inspection, Review, Reliance, Use, Currentness, and Decision Support — finding 12",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-009-f12",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-005",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/operational-evidence-qualification/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The source report identifies this proposition for governed review: PAT-ORD (Point-in-Time Reliance Decision): The deterministic output of evaluating an inspection graph against a PAT-ORP. It states that at time ![][image1], the graph met policy ![][image2].",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 12 from report REP-K01-005; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-009-f12",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "evidence-architecture-research-plan-1.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-005",
      "originalFilename": "Evidence Architecture Research Plan(1).md",
      "sha256": "3921560c86a819f02f86dd4b7c8ac29dd45491a03d3c12d307d6eb9f6b2ae0de",
      "sizeBytes": 83110
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "12\\. Use Receipt and Reproducibility Model",
        "sourceFilename": "evidence-architecture-research-plan-1.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-005",
        "sourceSha256": "3921560c86a819f02f86dd4b7c8ac29dd45491a03d3c12d307d6eb9f6b2ae0de",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  }
]