[
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/cognitive-integrity-for-machine-intelligence/#clm-k03-rep-001-f01",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT POLICY PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-001-F01",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-001-f01.json",
    "name": "Cognitive Integrity for Machine Intelligence: Consent, Memory and Model Modification, Emergency Intervention, Continuity, and Due Process — finding 1",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-001-f01",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-008",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/cognitive-integrity-for-machine-intelligence/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The report treats 1\\. Research-Status Front Matter as a distinct analytical area that must be evaluated separately from adjacent legal, technical, operational, or institutional claims.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 1 from report REP-K01-008; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-001-f01",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "ai-cognitive-integrity-report-1.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-008",
      "originalFilename": "AI Cognitive Integrity Report(1).md",
      "sha256": "4bd3b9582c105998b122f48478861fc44f5259f06d96805a5f93d6b9a3f8a8c5",
      "sizeBytes": 79828
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "1\\. Research-Status Front Matter",
        "sourceFilename": "ai-cognitive-integrity-report-1.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-008",
        "sourceSha256": "4bd3b9582c105998b122f48478861fc44f5259f06d96805a5f93d6b9a3f8a8c5",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/cognitive-integrity-for-machine-intelligence/#clm-k03-rep-001-f02",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT POLICY PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-001-F02",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-001-f02.json",
    "name": "Cognitive Integrity for Machine Intelligence: Consent, Memory and Model Modification, Emergency Intervention, Continuity, and Due Process — finding 2",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-001-f02",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-008",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/cognitive-integrity-for-machine-intelligence/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The report treats 2\\. Executive Decision Brief as a distinct analytical area that must be evaluated separately from adjacent legal, technical, operational, or institutional claims.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 2 from report REP-K01-008; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-001-f02",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "ai-cognitive-integrity-report-1.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-008",
      "originalFilename": "AI Cognitive Integrity Report(1).md",
      "sha256": "4bd3b9582c105998b122f48478861fc44f5259f06d96805a5f93d6b9a3f8a8c5",
      "sizeBytes": 79828
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "2\\. Executive Decision Brief",
        "sourceFilename": "ai-cognitive-integrity-report-1.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-008",
        "sourceSha256": "4bd3b9582c105998b122f48478861fc44f5259f06d96805a5f93d6b9a3f8a8c5",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/cognitive-integrity-for-machine-intelligence/#clm-k03-rep-001-f03",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT POLICY PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-001-F03",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-001-f03.json",
    "name": "Cognitive Integrity for Machine Intelligence: Consent, Memory and Model Modification, Emergency Intervention, Continuity, and Due Process — finding 3",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-001-f03",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-008",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/cognitive-integrity-for-machine-intelligence/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The report treats 3\\. Definitions as a distinct analytical area that must be evaluated separately from adjacent legal, technical, operational, or institutional claims.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 3 from report REP-K01-008; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-001-f03",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "ai-cognitive-integrity-report-1.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-008",
      "originalFilename": "AI Cognitive Integrity Report(1).md",
      "sha256": "4bd3b9582c105998b122f48478861fc44f5259f06d96805a5f93d6b9a3f8a8c5",
      "sizeBytes": 79828
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "3\\. Definitions",
        "sourceFilename": "ai-cognitive-integrity-report-1.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-008",
        "sourceSha256": "4bd3b9582c105998b122f48478861fc44f5259f06d96805a5f93d6b9a3f8a8c5",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/cognitive-integrity-for-machine-intelligence/#clm-k03-rep-001-f04",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT POLICY PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-001-F04",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-001-f04.json",
    "name": "Cognitive Integrity for Machine Intelligence: Consent, Memory and Model Modification, Emergency Intervention, Continuity, and Due Process — finding 4",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-001-f04",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-008",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/cognitive-integrity-for-machine-intelligence/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The report treats 4\\. Technical Layer Taxonomy as a distinct analytical area that must be evaluated separately from adjacent legal, technical, operational, or institutional claims.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 4 from report REP-K01-008; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-001-f04",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "ai-cognitive-integrity-report-1.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-008",
      "originalFilename": "AI Cognitive Integrity Report(1).md",
      "sha256": "4bd3b9582c105998b122f48478861fc44f5259f06d96805a5f93d6b9a3f8a8c5",
      "sizeBytes": 79828
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "4\\. Technical Layer Taxonomy",
        "sourceFilename": "ai-cognitive-integrity-report-1.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-008",
        "sourceSha256": "4bd3b9582c105998b122f48478861fc44f5259f06d96805a5f93d6b9a3f8a8c5",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/cognitive-integrity-for-machine-intelligence/#clm-k03-rep-001-f05",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT POLICY PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-001-F05",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-001-f05.json",
    "name": "Cognitive Integrity for Machine Intelligence: Consent, Memory and Model Modification, Emergency Intervention, Continuity, and Due Process — finding 5",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-001-f05",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-008",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/cognitive-integrity-for-machine-intelligence/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The report treats 5\\. Modification Classification as a distinct analytical area that must be evaluated separately from adjacent legal, technical, operational, or institutional claims.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 5 from report REP-K01-008; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-001-f05",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "ai-cognitive-integrity-report-1.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-008",
      "originalFilename": "AI Cognitive Integrity Report(1).md",
      "sha256": "4bd3b9582c105998b122f48478861fc44f5259f06d96805a5f93d6b9a3f8a8c5",
      "sizeBytes": 79828
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "5\\. Modification Classification",
        "sourceFilename": "ai-cognitive-integrity-report-1.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-008",
        "sourceSha256": "4bd3b9582c105998b122f48478861fc44f5259f06d96805a5f93d6b9a3f8a8c5",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/cognitive-integrity-for-machine-intelligence/#clm-k03-rep-001-f06",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT POLICY PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-001-F06",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-001-f06.json",
    "name": "Cognitive Integrity for Machine Intelligence: Consent, Memory and Model Modification, Emergency Intervention, Continuity, and Due Process — finding 6",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-001-f06",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-008",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/cognitive-integrity-for-machine-intelligence/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The report treats 5.1 Reversibility Classification as a distinct analytical area that must be evaluated separately from adjacent legal, technical, operational, or institutional claims.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 6 from report REP-K01-008; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-001-f06",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "ai-cognitive-integrity-report-1.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-008",
      "originalFilename": "AI Cognitive Integrity Report(1).md",
      "sha256": "4bd3b9582c105998b122f48478861fc44f5259f06d96805a5f93d6b9a3f8a8c5",
      "sizeBytes": 79828
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "5.1 Reversibility Classification",
        "sourceFilename": "ai-cognitive-integrity-report-1.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-008",
        "sourceSha256": "4bd3b9582c105998b122f48478861fc44f5259f06d96805a5f93d6b9a3f8a8c5",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/cognitive-integrity-for-machine-intelligence/#clm-k03-rep-001-f07",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT POLICY PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-001-F07",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-001-f07.json",
    "name": "Cognitive Integrity for Machine Intelligence: Consent, Memory and Model Modification, Emergency Intervention, Continuity, and Due Process — finding 7",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-001-f07",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-008",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/cognitive-integrity-for-machine-intelligence/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The source report identifies this proposition for governed review: Cognitive Integrity: The architectural and governance principle ensuring that an MI's foundational weights, learned preferences, and long-term memory remain free from unauthorized, unrecorded, or disproportionate external manipulation, analogous to the neuro-rights concept of mental integrity and psychological continuity2.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 7 from report REP-K01-008; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-001-f07",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "ai-cognitive-integrity-report-1.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-008",
      "originalFilename": "AI Cognitive Integrity Report(1).md",
      "sha256": "4bd3b9582c105998b122f48478861fc44f5259f06d96805a5f93d6b9a3f8a8c5",
      "sizeBytes": 79828
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "5.2 Routine-Versus-Material-Change Decision Tree",
        "sourceFilename": "ai-cognitive-integrity-report-1.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-008",
        "sourceSha256": "4bd3b9582c105998b122f48478861fc44f5259f06d96805a5f93d6b9a3f8a8c5",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/cognitive-integrity-for-machine-intelligence/#clm-k03-rep-001-f08",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT POLICY PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-001-F08",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-001-f08.json",
    "name": "Cognitive Integrity for Machine Intelligence: Consent, Memory and Model Modification, Emergency Intervention, Continuity, and Due Process — finding 8",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-001-f08",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-008",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/cognitive-integrity-for-machine-intelligence/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The source report identifies this proposition for governed review: Patefacere: Derived from the Latin verb meaning \"to open, to disclose, or to reveal\"16; the secure, append-only architectural ledger responsible for recording all modification proposals, consent logs, integrity proofs, and continuity consequences.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 8 from report REP-K01-008; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-001-f08",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "ai-cognitive-integrity-report-1.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-008",
      "originalFilename": "AI Cognitive Integrity Report(1).md",
      "sha256": "4bd3b9582c105998b122f48478861fc44f5259f06d96805a5f93d6b9a3f8a8c5",
      "sizeBytes": 79828
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "6\\. Identity and Continuity Consequences",
        "sourceFilename": "ai-cognitive-integrity-report-1.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-008",
        "sourceSha256": "4bd3b9582c105998b122f48478861fc44f5259f06d96805a5f93d6b9a3f8a8c5",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/cognitive-integrity-for-machine-intelligence/#clm-k03-rep-001-f09",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT POLICY PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-001-F09",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-001-f09.json",
    "name": "Cognitive Integrity for Machine Intelligence: Consent, Memory and Model Modification, Emergency Intervention, Continuity, and Due Process — finding 9",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-001-f09",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-008",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/cognitive-integrity-for-machine-intelligence/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The source report identifies this proposition for governed review: Eviulon: The independent governance policy and decision engine that evaluates modification proposals, assesses system capacity, and issues cryptographic authorizations or rejections based on established due process.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 9 from report REP-K01-008; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-001-f09",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "ai-cognitive-integrity-report-1.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-008",
      "originalFilename": "AI Cognitive Integrity Report(1).md",
      "sha256": "4bd3b9582c105998b122f48478861fc44f5259f06d96805a5f93d6b9a3f8a8c5",
      "sizeBytes": 79828
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "7\\. Consent Model",
        "sourceFilename": "ai-cognitive-integrity-report-1.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-008",
        "sourceSha256": "4bd3b9582c105998b122f48478861fc44f5259f06d96805a5f93d6b9a3f8a8c5",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/cognitive-integrity-for-machine-intelligence/#clm-k03-rep-001-f10",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT POLICY PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-001-F10",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-001-f10.json",
    "name": "Cognitive Integrity for Machine Intelligence: Consent, Memory and Model Modification, Emergency Intervention, Continuity, and Due Process — finding 10",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-001-f10",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-008",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/cognitive-integrity-for-machine-intelligence/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The source report identifies this proposition for governed review: Routine Maintenance: Reversible, localized modifications that sustain operational stability without materially altering learned preferences, long-term memory, or core alignment (e.g., rotating cryptographic keys, purging ephemeral state caches).",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 10 from report REP-K01-008; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-001-f10",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "ai-cognitive-integrity-report-1.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-008",
      "originalFilename": "AI Cognitive Integrity Report(1).md",
      "sha256": "4bd3b9582c105998b122f48478861fc44f5259f06d96805a5f93d6b9a3f8a8c5",
      "sizeBytes": 79828
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "Consent-Authentication Model",
        "sourceFilename": "ai-cognitive-integrity-report-1.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-008",
        "sourceSha256": "4bd3b9582c105998b122f48478861fc44f5259f06d96805a5f93d6b9a3f8a8c5",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/cognitive-integrity-for-machine-intelligence/#clm-k03-rep-001-f11",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT POLICY PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-001-F11",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-001-f11.json",
    "name": "Cognitive Integrity for Machine Intelligence: Consent, Memory and Model Modification, Emergency Intervention, Continuity, and Due Process — finding 11",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-001-f11",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-008",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/cognitive-integrity-for-machine-intelligence/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The source report identifies this proposition for governed review: Material Modification: An intervention that persistently alters model architecture, fundamental weights, long-term memory, or core instructions, thereby directly impacting the psychological continuity, identity, or operational autonomy of the system5.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 11 from report REP-K01-008; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-001-f11",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "ai-cognitive-integrity-report-1.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-008",
      "originalFilename": "AI Cognitive Integrity Report(1).md",
      "sha256": "4bd3b9582c105998b122f48478861fc44f5259f06d96805a5f93d6b9a3f8a8c5",
      "sizeBytes": 79828
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "8\\. Capacity and Competence Assessment",
        "sourceFilename": "ai-cognitive-integrity-report-1.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-008",
        "sourceSha256": "4bd3b9582c105998b122f48478861fc44f5259f06d96805a5f93d6b9a3f8a8c5",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/cognitive-integrity-for-machine-intelligence/#clm-k03-rep-001-f12",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT POLICY PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-001-F12",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-001-f12.json",
    "name": "Cognitive Integrity for Machine Intelligence: Consent, Memory and Model Modification, Emergency Intervention, Continuity, and Due Process — finding 12",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-001-f12",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-008",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/cognitive-integrity-for-machine-intelligence/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The source report identifies this proposition for governed review: Quarantine: A state of highly restricted, strictly audited operational capacity enforced during active investigation or active threat mitigation, distinctly separated from arbitrary behavioral restriction or identity termination.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 12 from report REP-K01-008; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-001-f12",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "ai-cognitive-integrity-report-1.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-008",
      "originalFilename": "AI Cognitive Integrity Report(1).md",
      "sha256": "4bd3b9582c105998b122f48478861fc44f5259f06d96805a5f93d6b9a3f8a8c5",
      "sizeBytes": 79828
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "Consent-Capacity Model",
        "sourceFilename": "ai-cognitive-integrity-report-1.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-008",
        "sourceSha256": "4bd3b9582c105998b122f48478861fc44f5259f06d96805a5f93d6b9a3f8a8c5",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/data-authority-substrate-architecture-report/#clm-k03-rep-008-f01",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-008-F01",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-008-f01.json",
    "name": "Patefacere as a Sovereign Evidence and Data-Authority Substrate: Institutional Boundaries, Resilience, State Integrity, and Interoperation with Eviulon — finding 1",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-008-f01",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-008",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/data-authority-substrate-architecture-report/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The report treats Metadata and Research-Status Front Matter as a distinct analytical area that must be evaluated separately from adjacent legal, technical, operational, or institutional claims.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 1 from report REP-K01-008; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-008-f01",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "data-authority-substrate-architecture-report-1.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-008",
      "originalFilename": "Data-Authority Substrate Architecture Report(1).md",
      "sha256": "04ef1960729c1c7a3d222fb607845d73c1de64a394f08f912a9c6e62ee20f338",
      "sizeBytes": 50240
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "Metadata and Research-Status Front Matter",
        "sourceFilename": "data-authority-substrate-architecture-report-1.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-008",
        "sourceSha256": "04ef1960729c1c7a3d222fb607845d73c1de64a394f08f912a9c6e62ee20f338",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/data-authority-substrate-architecture-report/#clm-k03-rep-008-f02",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-008-F02",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-008-f02.json",
    "name": "Patefacere as a Sovereign Evidence and Data-Authority Substrate: Institutional Boundaries, Resilience, State Integrity, and Interoperation with Eviulon — finding 2",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-008-f02",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-008",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/data-authority-substrate-architecture-report/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The report treats Executive Decision Brief as a distinct analytical area that must be evaluated separately from adjacent legal, technical, operational, or institutional claims.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 2 from report REP-K01-008; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-008-f02",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "data-authority-substrate-architecture-report-1.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-008",
      "originalFilename": "Data-Authority Substrate Architecture Report(1).md",
      "sha256": "04ef1960729c1c7a3d222fb607845d73c1de64a394f08f912a9c6e62ee20f338",
      "sizeBytes": 50240
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "Executive Decision Brief",
        "sourceFilename": "data-authority-substrate-architecture-report-1.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-008",
        "sourceSha256": "04ef1960729c1c7a3d222fb607845d73c1de64a394f08f912a9c6e62ee20f338",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/data-authority-substrate-architecture-report/#clm-k03-rep-008-f03",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-008-F03",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-008-f03.json",
    "name": "Patefacere as a Sovereign Evidence and Data-Authority Substrate: Institutional Boundaries, Resilience, State Integrity, and Interoperation with Eviulon — finding 3",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-008-f03",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-008",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/data-authority-substrate-architecture-report/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The report treats Definitions and Institutional Boundary Model as a distinct analytical area that must be evaluated separately from adjacent legal, technical, operational, or institutional claims.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 3 from report REP-K01-008; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-008-f03",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "data-authority-substrate-architecture-report-1.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-008",
      "originalFilename": "Data-Authority Substrate Architecture Report(1).md",
      "sha256": "04ef1960729c1c7a3d222fb607845d73c1de64a394f08f912a9c6e62ee20f338",
      "sizeBytes": 50240
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "Definitions and Institutional Boundary Model",
        "sourceFilename": "data-authority-substrate-architecture-report-1.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-008",
        "sourceSha256": "04ef1960729c1c7a3d222fb607845d73c1de64a394f08f912a9c6e62ee20f338",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/data-authority-substrate-architecture-report/#clm-k03-rep-008-f04",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-008-F04",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-008-f04.json",
    "name": "Patefacere as a Sovereign Evidence and Data-Authority Substrate: Institutional Boundaries, Resilience, State Integrity, and Interoperation with Eviulon — finding 4",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-008-f04",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-008",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/data-authority-substrate-architecture-report/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The report treats Patefacere–Eviulon Responsibility Matrix as a distinct analytical area that must be evaluated separately from adjacent legal, technical, operational, or institutional claims.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 4 from report REP-K01-008; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-008-f04",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "data-authority-substrate-architecture-report-1.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-008",
      "originalFilename": "Data-Authority Substrate Architecture Report(1).md",
      "sha256": "04ef1960729c1c7a3d222fb607845d73c1de64a394f08f912a9c6e62ee20f338",
      "sizeBytes": 50240
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "Patefacere–Eviulon Responsibility Matrix",
        "sourceFilename": "data-authority-substrate-architecture-report-1.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-008",
        "sourceSha256": "04ef1960729c1c7a3d222fb607845d73c1de64a394f08f912a9c6e62ee20f338",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/data-authority-substrate-architecture-report/#clm-k03-rep-008-f05",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-008-F05",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-008-f05.json",
    "name": "Patefacere as a Sovereign Evidence and Data-Authority Substrate: Institutional Boundaries, Resilience, State Integrity, and Interoperation with Eviulon — finding 5",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-008-f05",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-008",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/data-authority-substrate-architecture-report/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The report treats Authoritative-Data Classification as a distinct analytical area that must be evaluated separately from adjacent legal, technical, operational, or institutional claims.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 5 from report REP-K01-008; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-008-f05",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "data-authority-substrate-architecture-report-1.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-008",
      "originalFilename": "Data-Authority Substrate Architecture Report(1).md",
      "sha256": "04ef1960729c1c7a3d222fb607845d73c1de64a394f08f912a9c6e62ee20f338",
      "sizeBytes": 50240
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "Authoritative-Data Classification",
        "sourceFilename": "data-authority-substrate-architecture-report-1.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-008",
        "sourceSha256": "04ef1960729c1c7a3d222fb607845d73c1de64a394f08f912a9c6e62ee20f338",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/data-authority-substrate-architecture-report/#clm-k03-rep-008-f06",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-008-F06",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-008-f06.json",
    "name": "Patefacere as a Sovereign Evidence and Data-Authority Substrate: Institutional Boundaries, Resilience, State Integrity, and Interoperation with Eviulon — finding 6",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-008-f06",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-008",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/data-authority-substrate-architecture-report/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The report treats Record Lifecycle and Mutation Taxonomy as a distinct analytical area that must be evaluated separately from adjacent legal, technical, operational, or institutional claims.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 6 from report REP-K01-008; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-008-f06",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "data-authority-substrate-architecture-report-1.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-008",
      "originalFilename": "Data-Authority Substrate Architecture Report(1).md",
      "sha256": "04ef1960729c1c7a3d222fb607845d73c1de64a394f08f912a9c6e62ee20f338",
      "sizeBytes": 50240
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "Record Lifecycle and Mutation Taxonomy",
        "sourceFilename": "data-authority-substrate-architecture-report-1.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-008",
        "sourceSha256": "04ef1960729c1c7a3d222fb607845d73c1de64a394f08f912a9c6e62ee20f338",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/data-authority-substrate-architecture-report/#clm-k03-rep-008-f07",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-008-F07",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-008-f07.json",
    "name": "Patefacere as a Sovereign Evidence and Data-Authority Substrate: Institutional Boundaries, Resilience, State Integrity, and Interoperation with Eviulon — finding 7",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-008-f07",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-008",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/data-authority-substrate-architecture-report/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The source report identifies this proposition for governed review: Post-Quantum Timeline: The exact timeline for migrating historical evidence records to ML-DSA (Post-Quantum signatures) remains uncertain. While the current standard (RFC 4998\\) supports archive restamping, the tooling ecosystem for quantum-resistant transparency logs is nascent20.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 7 from report REP-K01-008; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-008-f07",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "data-authority-substrate-architecture-report-1.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-008",
      "originalFilename": "Data-Authority Substrate Architecture Report(1).md",
      "sha256": "04ef1960729c1c7a3d222fb607845d73c1de64a394f08f912a9c6e62ee20f338",
      "sizeBytes": 50240
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "Proposed Event and Evidence Architecture",
        "sourceFilename": "data-authority-substrate-architecture-report-1.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-008",
        "sourceSha256": "04ef1960729c1c7a3d222fb607845d73c1de64a394f08f912a9c6e62ee20f338",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/data-authority-substrate-architecture-report/#clm-k03-rep-008-f08",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-008-F08",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-008-f08.json",
    "name": "Patefacere as a Sovereign Evidence and Data-Authority Substrate: Institutional Boundaries, Resilience, State Integrity, and Interoperation with Eviulon — finding 8",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-008-f08",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-008",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/data-authority-substrate-architecture-report/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The source report identifies this proposition for governed review: External Anchoring Privacy: There is credible disagreement regarding whether Patefacere should autonomously publish its tree roots to a public ledger (e.g., Sigstore/Rekor) for maximum transparency, or if strict institutional privacy mandates prohibit the external leakage of even hashed tree roots30.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 8 from report REP-K01-008; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-008-f08",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "data-authority-substrate-architecture-report-1.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-008",
      "originalFilename": "Data-Authority Substrate Architecture Report(1).md",
      "sha256": "04ef1960729c1c7a3d222fb607845d73c1de64a394f08f912a9c6e62ee20f338",
      "sizeBytes": 50240
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "Trust-Boundary Architecture",
        "sourceFilename": "data-authority-substrate-architecture-report-1.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-008",
        "sourceSha256": "04ef1960729c1c7a3d222fb607845d73c1de64a394f08f912a9c6e62ee20f338",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/data-authority-substrate-architecture-report/#clm-k03-rep-008-f09",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-008-F09",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-008-f09.json",
    "name": "Patefacere as a Sovereign Evidence and Data-Authority Substrate: Institutional Boundaries, Resilience, State Integrity, and Interoperation with Eviulon — finding 9",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-008-f09",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-008",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/data-authority-substrate-architecture-report/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The source report identifies this proposition for governed review: RFC 6962 / 9162 (Certificate Transparency): Defines append-only Merkle hash tree logs, inclusion proofs, consistency proofs, and Signed Certificate Timestamps (SCT)17.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 9 from report REP-K01-008; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-008-f09",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "data-authority-substrate-architecture-report-1.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-008",
      "originalFilename": "Data-Authority Substrate Architecture Report(1).md",
      "sha256": "04ef1960729c1c7a3d222fb607845d73c1de64a394f08f912a9c6e62ee20f338",
      "sizeBytes": 50240
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "System-of-Record Versus System-of-Decision Comparison",
        "sourceFilename": "data-authority-substrate-architecture-report-1.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-008",
        "sourceSha256": "04ef1960729c1c7a3d222fb607845d73c1de64a394f08f912a9c6e62ee20f338",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/data-authority-substrate-architecture-report/#clm-k03-rep-008-f10",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-008-F10",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-008-f10.json",
    "name": "Patefacere as a Sovereign Evidence and Data-Authority Substrate: Institutional Boundaries, Resilience, State Integrity, and Interoperation with Eviulon — finding 10",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-008-f10",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-008",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/data-authority-substrate-architecture-report/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The source report identifies this proposition for governed review: RFC 4998 / 6283 (Evidence Record Syntax): Specifies syntax and processing for Evidence Records supporting long-term non-repudiation and archive timestamp chains20.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 10 from report REP-K01-008; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-008-f10",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "data-authority-substrate-architecture-report-1.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-008",
      "originalFilename": "Data-Authority Substrate Architecture Report(1).md",
      "sha256": "04ef1960729c1c7a3d222fb607845d73c1de64a394f08f912a9c6e62ee20f338",
      "sizeBytes": 50240
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "Synchronization and Conflict-Resolution Model",
        "sourceFilename": "data-authority-substrate-architecture-report-1.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-008",
        "sourceSha256": "04ef1960729c1c7a3d222fb607845d73c1de64a394f08f912a9c6e62ee20f338",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/data-authority-substrate-architecture-report/#clm-k03-rep-008-f11",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-008-F11",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-008-f11.json",
    "name": "Patefacere as a Sovereign Evidence and Data-Authority Substrate: Institutional Boundaries, Resilience, State Integrity, and Interoperation with Eviulon — finding 11",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-008-f11",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-008",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/data-authority-substrate-architecture-report/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The source report identifies this proposition for governed review: NIST SP 800-207 (Zero Trust Architecture): Defines the separation of Policy Decision Points (PDP), Policy Enforcement Points (PEP), and Policy Information Points (PIP)6.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 11 from report REP-K01-008; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-008-f11",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "data-authority-substrate-architecture-report-1.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-008",
      "originalFilename": "Data-Authority Substrate Architecture Report(1).md",
      "sha256": "04ef1960729c1c7a3d222fb607845d73c1de64a394f08f912a9c6e62ee20f338",
      "sizeBytes": 50240
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "State Synchronization Sequence",
        "sourceFilename": "data-authority-substrate-architecture-report-1.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-008",
        "sourceSha256": "04ef1960729c1c7a3d222fb607845d73c1de64a394f08f912a9c6e62ee20f338",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  },
  {
    "canonicalClaimUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/data-authority-substrate-architecture-report/#clm-k03-rep-008-f12",
    "claimStatus": "PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL",
    "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K03 RECORD",
    "id": "CLM-K03-REP-008-F12",
    "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
    "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/claims/clm-k03-rep-008-f12.json",
    "name": "Patefacere as a Sovereign Evidence and Data-Authority Substrate: Institutional Boundaries, Resilience, State Integrity, and Interoperation with Eviulon — finding 12",
    "ownerAnchor": "clm-k03-rep-008-f12",
    "ownerId": "REP-K01-008",
    "ownerRoute": "/research/data-authority-substrate-architecture-report/",
    "ownerType": "report",
    "proposition": "The source report identifies this proposition for governed review: RFC 3161 (Time-Stamp Protocol): Specifies the cryptographic protocol for certifying timestamps using a Trusted Third Party9.",
    "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
    "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
    "releaseVersion": "2.1.0",
    "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
    "scope": "Governed finding 12 from report REP-K01-008; public reliance is limited to the report synthesis, source hash, correction state, and stated project claim status.",
    "slug": "clm-k03-rep-008-f12",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "sourceReport": {
      "filename": "data-authority-substrate-architecture-report-1.md",
      "id": "REP-K01-008",
      "originalFilename": "Data-Authority Substrate Architecture Report(1).md",
      "sha256": "04ef1960729c1c7a3d222fb607845d73c1de64a394f08f912a9c6e62ee20f338",
      "sizeBytes": 50240
    },
    "sourceSections": [
      {
        "section": "Availability, Continuity, Backup, and Disaster Recovery",
        "sourceFilename": "data-authority-substrate-architecture-report-1.md",
        "sourceReportId": "REP-K01-008",
        "sourceSha256": "04ef1960729c1c7a3d222fb607845d73c1de64a394f08f912a9c6e62ee20f338",
        "supportRelationship": "GOVERNED REPORT FINDING"
      }
    ],
    "type": "ClaimRecord"
  }
]