{
  "canonicalUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/comparisons/scheduler-simulation-vs-runtime/",
  "claimStatus": "PROJECT DOCTRINE",
  "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K05 RELEASE",
  "decisionUse": "Use this distinction to prevent deterministic test evidence, signatures, consensus, merge output, stress results, gate states, process replay, scheduler simulation, labels, or release diffs from being represented as authority, deployment, operation, or factual truth.",
  "distinction": "Scheduler simulation and Scheduler runtime answer different evidentiary, governance, release, or operational questions and must remain separate.",
  "failure": "Conflation can manufacture readiness, erase uncertainty, bypass accountable review, or expose protected information.",
  "id": "K01-COMP-094",
  "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
  "left": "Scheduler simulation",
  "leftMeaning": "Static expected-run and failure behavior is modeled.",
  "name": "Scheduler simulation vs Scheduler runtime",
  "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
  "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
  "right": "Scheduler runtime",
  "rightMeaning": "A deployed scheduler executes jobs and produces current observed results.",
  "slug": "scheduler-simulation-vs-runtime",
  "sourceRevalidatedAt": "2026-08-15T23:00:00Z",
  "topic": "evidence-provenance",
  "type": "Comparison"
}