{
  "canonicalUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/contradictions/autonomous-response-versus-false-positive-consequence/",
  "claimStatus": "PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL",
  "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K05 RELEASE",
  "id": "CON-K04-STRAT-014",
  "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
  "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/contradictions/autonomous-response-versus-false-positive-consequence.json",
  "name": "Autonomous response speed versus false-positive consequence",
  "propositionA": "Rapid isolation can stop machine-speed lateral movement.",
  "propositionB": "An incorrect isolation in OT, cooling, power, or safety systems can itself cause the high-consequence event.",
  "relationship": "DEFENSIVE SPEED VERSUS CYBER-PHYSICAL SAFETY",
  "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
  "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
  "resolution": "Use consequence models, independent corroboration, progressive tiers, reversible containment, runtime assurance, and tested safe states.",
  "resolutionStatus": "PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL",
  "slug": "autonomous-response-versus-false-positive-consequence",
  "sourceIds": [
    "SRC-INL-CCE",
    "SRC-NIST-800-82R3"
  ],
  "sourceRevalidatedAt": "2026-08-15T23:00:00Z",
  "topic": "cyber-physical-mission-assurance",
  "type": "Contradiction"
}