{
  "canonicalUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/contradictions/cyber-sovereignty-rule-versus-principle/",
  "claimStatus": "DISPUTED",
  "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K05 RELEASE",
  "id": "CON-K04-011",
  "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
  "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/contradictions/cyber-sovereignty-rule-versus-principle.json",
  "name": "Cyber sovereignty as a primary rule versus a guiding principle",
  "propositionA": "Unauthorized remote cyber intrusion can itself violate a binding rule of territorial sovereignty.",
  "propositionB": "Sovereignty is a foundational principle, while international wrongfulness requires breach of a more specific rule such as non-intervention or the prohibition of force.",
  "relationship": "COMPETING LEGAL POSITIONS",
  "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
  "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
  "resolution": "K04 preserves both positions and requires the applicable state position, effects, governmental function, jurisdiction, and current primary authority before reaching a legal conclusion.",
  "resolutionStatus": "DISPUTED",
  "slug": "cyber-sovereignty-rule-versus-principle",
  "sourceIds": [],
  "sourceRevalidatedAt": "2026-08-15T23:00:00Z",
  "topic": "law-jurisdiction",
  "type": "Contradiction"
}