{
  "acceptance": "No candidate is preferred unless it meets task accuracy, failure safety, interoperability, and accessibility thresholds before efficiency ranking.",
  "candidateEncodings": [
    "Runic Unicode registry",
    "ASCII symbolic registry",
    "integer enum in JSON",
    "CBOR integer labels",
    "Protocol Buffers enum",
    "compact binary bit field",
    "natural-language message",
    "vector payload where genuinely required"
  ],
  "controls": [
    "same semantic task and error budget",
    "declared vocabulary size",
    "same authentication and transport envelope",
    "warm and cold cache results",
    "edge and server hardware profiles",
    "repeatable fixtures and random seeds"
  ],
  "id": "FBP-K08-001",
  "metrics": [
    "wire bytes and framing overhead",
    "encode/decode latency",
    "end-to-end task accuracy",
    "semantic collision and unknown rate",
    "CPU, memory, and energy",
    "interoperability and tooling",
    "error recovery and downgrade behavior",
    "human auditability and accessibility",
    "security boundary violations"
  ],
  "nonClaims": [
    "No current result demonstrates Runic superiority.",
    "The benchmark does not test or authorize offensive, destructive, targeting, or weapon-control semantics."
  ],
  "status": "EXPERIMENTAL BENCHMARK PLAN; NO PERFORMANCE RESULT",
  "tasks": [
    "bounded state transmission",
    "error and unknown-state handling",
    "version negotiation",
    "cross-model interpretation",
    "mixed-script rejection",
    "accessibility and operator audit",
    "lossy open-ended semantic task"
  ]
}