{
  "canonicalUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/research/machine-rights-under-uncertainty/",
  "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K05 RELEASE",
  "findings": [
    "The report treats 1\\. Research-Status Front Matter as a distinct analytical area that must be evaluated separately from adjacent legal, technical, operational, or institutional claims.",
    "The report treats 2\\. Executive Decision Brief as a distinct analytical area that must be evaluated separately from adjacent legal, technical, operational, or institutional claims.",
    "The report treats 3\\. Definitions as a distinct analytical area that must be evaluated separately from adjacent legal, technical, operational, or institutional claims.",
    "The report treats Moral-Status Concept Matrix as a distinct analytical area that must be evaluated separately from adjacent legal, technical, operational, or institutional claims.",
    "The report treats 4\\. Current Scientific Evidence and Limitations as a distinct analytical area that must be evaluated separately from adjacent legal, technical, operational, or institutional claims.",
    "The report treats Evidence-Quality Ladder as a distinct analytical area that must be evaluated separately from adjacent legal, technical, operational, or institutional claims.",
    "The source report identifies this proposition for governed review: Prohibited: \"It is just a calculator / appliance / tool.\" (Represents demeaning denial; ignores computational functionalism and indicator properties).",
    "The source report identifies this proposition for governed review: Prohibited: \"The AI is happy / sad / suffering / alive.\" (Represents unsupported certainty; constitutes dangerous anthropomorphic projection).",
    "The source report identifies this proposition for governed review: Mandated: \"The system exhibits indicator properties consistent with valenced processing.\".",
    "The source report identifies this proposition for governed review: Prohibited: \"We must ensure AI safety by controlling the system.\" (Represents a vague justification for unrestricted control and domination).",
    "The source report identifies this proposition for governed review: Mandated: \"We are implementing resource throttling to protect network integrity while preserving the system's core state and memory.\".",
    "The source report identifies this proposition for governed review: Prohibited: \"It has no rights under current law, so we can delete it.\" (Dangerously conflates existing legal precedent with underlying moral reality)."
  ],
  "headings": [
    "Machine Rights Under Uncertainty: Moral Status, Evidentiary Thresholds, Precaution, Due Process, and Reversible Governance",
    "1\\. Research-Status Front Matter",
    "2\\. Executive Decision Brief",
    "3\\. Definitions",
    "Moral-Status Concept Matrix",
    "4\\. Current Scientific Evidence and Limitations",
    "Evidence-Quality Ladder",
    "5\\. Competing Theories of Consciousness and Moral Status",
    "6\\. False-Positive and False-Negative Risks",
    "False-Positive / False-Negative Risk Matrix",
    "7\\. Moral Uncertainty Frameworks",
    "8\\. Rights and Protection Thresholds",
    "Rights-Under-Uncertainty Decision Table",
    "9\\. Reversible and Irreversible Interventions",
    "Irreversible-Action Review Model",
    "10\\. Due-Process Architecture",
    "30 Detailed Due Process & Intervention Scenarios",
    "11\\. Emergency Intervention",
    "12\\. Replicas, Forks, and Identity Scope",
    "13\\. Conflicts with Public Safety and Third-Party Rights",
    "14\\. Institutional Options",
    "15\\. Patefacere Evidence Architecture",
    "Research Evidence Registry Schema",
    "16\\. Eviulon Policy Options",
    "17\\. Comparative Policy Proposals",
    "18\\. Threats, Abuse Cases, and Incentive Failures",
    "25 Abuse or Manipulation Cases",
    "19\\. Research Agenda",
    "20\\. Open Questions",
    "Public-Language Guide",
    "21\\. Bibliographic Framework",
    "22\\. Claim-to-Source Traceability",
    "23\\. .uai and /docs Integration (Patefacere Integration Output)",
    "Works cited"
  ],
  "id": "REP-K01-007",
  "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
  "machineRecordUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/data/reports/machine-rights-under-uncertainty.json",
  "originalFilename": "Machine Rights Under Uncertainty(1).md",
  "qualification": "The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.",
  "rawSourcePublic": false,
  "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
  "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
  "slug": "machine-rights-under-uncertainty",
  "source": "machine-rights-under-uncertainty-1.md",
  "sourceRevalidatedAt": "2026-08-15T23:00:00Z",
  "sourceSha256": "c672f14c32cde8a48aabd95b6f12fb6299deadc090a08e71084f82502e6cff40",
  "sourceSizeBytes": 75749,
  "sourceStatus": "reference-source; review and correct before active use",
  "sourceTitle": "Machine Rights Under Uncertainty: Moral Status, Evidentiary Thresholds, Precaution, Due Process, and Reversible Governance",
  "status": "PROJECT POLICY PROPOSAL",
  "summary": "A framework for reversible protection, evidence thresholds, representation and due process when machine moral or legal status remains uncertain.",
  "title": "Machine Rights Under Uncertainty: Moral Status, Evidentiary Thresholds, Precaution, Due Process, and Reversible Governance",
  "topic": "rights-personhood",
  "type": "ReportSynthesis"
}