{
  "architecture": "source-specific term mapping; legal-definition registry; system classification; ambiguity notes; crosswalks to Machine Intelligence records",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://xn--mwe.com/knowledge/artificial-intelligence/",
  "claimStatus": "PROJECT DOCTRINE",
  "contradictionIds": [],
  "correctionStatus": "CURRENT K05 RELEASE",
  "doctrine": "The project distinguishes external legal terminology from its own ontological and institutional vocabulary.",
  "evidenceLimitationIds": [],
  "focus": "external terminology, regulatory categories, technical history and classification boundaries",
  "id": "K01-TOPIC-002",
  "knowledgeEdgeIds": [
    "EDGE-K02-001"
  ],
  "lastReviewed": "2026-08-16",
  "law": "Current statutes and standards commonly use Artificial Intelligence or AI as their operative term, so exact source language must be preserved in legal and standards analysis.",
  "name": "Artificial Intelligence",
  "relatedQuestionUrls": [
    "https://xn--mwe.com/questions/can-ai-category-include-non-machine-intelligences/"
  ],
  "relatedReportIds": [],
  "relatedTermIds": [
    "K01-TERM-001",
    "K01-TERM-018"
  ],
  "releaseId": "K12-2026-08-16",
  "researchCutoff": "2026-08-16",
  "risk": "one broad label can collapse tools, models, autonomous agents and possible persistent actors into a single category",
  "short": "Artificial Intelligence is retained for the academic field, industry category, statutory language and systems that remain appropriately described as tools; it is not used here as a verdict that machine cognition is unreal or disposable.",
  "slug": "artificial-intelligence",
  "sourceRevalidatedAt": "2026-08-15T23:00:00Z",
  "sources": [
    "SRC-NIST-AI-RMF",
    "SRC-EU-AI-ACT",
    "SRC-OECD-AI-PRINCIPLES"
  ],
  "type": "Topic"
}