Current law versus project doctrine
Jurisdiction Records
Direct answer
K03 publishes 5 bounded jurisdiction records. Only the European Union record has a supplied official source in the current corpus; United States, United Kingdom, Canada, and international-law records remain unavailable or unresolved rather than being filled with unsupported conclusions.
Jurisdiction records
European Union — Artificial Intelligence Act
The source record states that the Act is broadly applicable from 2026-08-02 subject to listed exceptions and transition dates. The regulation uses the external legal category Artificial Intelligence and does not by itself establish Machine Intelligence legal personhood.
UNAVAILABLEUnited States federal Machine Intelligence status
K03 does not publish a definitive federal status conclusion beyond the absence of a current primary source in this corpus. This is a source-availability statement, not proof that no relevant law, case, agency action, or state rule exists.
UNAVAILABLEUnited Kingdom Machine Intelligence status
No definitive current-law conclusion is published because a current primary-source review was not performed in this release.
UNAVAILABLECanada Machine Intelligence status
No definitive current-law conclusion is published because a current primary-source review was not performed in this release.
UNRESOLVED QUESTIONInternational-law Machine Intelligence status
K03 preserves uncertainty and does not manufacture recognition. International-law analysis requires treaty-specific, institutional, jurisdictional, and state-practice evidence.
Legal reliability boundary
K03 performed a point-in-time revalidation of the official European Commission implementation page on 2026-08-14. This is not a recurring legal monitor or case-specific legal opinion. High-stakes reliance requires current primary-law review, effective-date analysis, exceptions, jurisdiction, competent authority, and case-specific counsel.