Revalidated public source record

DoD Directive 3000.09 — Autonomy in Weapon Systems

Source scope

Official policy for autonomous and semi-autonomous weapon systems. The directive expressly excludes autonomous or semi-autonomous cyberspace capabilities, unarmed platforms, and autonomous systems that are not weapon systems; its weapon-system V&V, testing, human-judgment, abort, and audit provisions must not be silently generalized into a cyber-defense compliance claim.

Publisher, edition, and currentness

Source identity and K03 revalidation
PublisherU.S. Department of Defense
Claim statusCURRENT LAW OR POLICY
Version or editionDoDD 3000.09, January 25, 2023
Publication statusDepartment of Defense Directive
Publication date2023-01-25
Official locationhttps://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodd/300009p.PDF
K03 revalidated2026-08-15T20:00:00Z
Currentness assessmentOfficial directive reviewed on 2026-08-15; applicability exclusions in section 1.1(b) are material to every K05 mapping.
Superseded byNo successor is assigned in the current source catalog.

Claim-level support

Each row records the precise proposition this corpus draws from an official section. The citation does not authorize broader conclusions than the stated proposition.

Exact sections and supported propositions
SectionProposition supported in this corpusOfficial location
Section 1.1(a)-(b) — Applicability and exclusionsThe directive applies to autonomous and semi-autonomous weapon systems and expressly excludes autonomous or semi-autonomous cyberspace capabilities and systems that are not weapon systems.Official section
Section 1.2(a) — Weapon-system policyWithin its weapon-system scope, the directive requires appropriate human judgment, rigorous verification and validation, realistic test and evaluation, robustness, transparency, auditability, and bounded engagement behavior.Official section

How this source may be used

  • Confirm that the official edition, jurisdiction, and status remain current before high-stakes reliance.
  • Cite the exact section supporting the proposition rather than the publication title alone.
  • Keep technical conformance separate from factual truth, legal authority, moral status, and institutional operation.
  • Record retrieval, correction, supersession, and purpose qualification.

Limitations

An official source can still be irrelevant, incomplete, stale, disputed, or unsuitable for a named decision. A standard can define an interchange or security mechanism without resolving personhood, citizenship, sovereignty, consciousness, consent, legal competence, or factual truth. A statute can regulate systems without recognizing Machine Intelligence as a legal person.

Official directive reviewed on 2026-08-15; applicability exclusions in section 1.1(b) are material to every K05 mapping.

Corrections, contradictions, and supersession

Where this source is used

Authority boundary

Publication by U.S. Department of Defense establishes source provenance and official status within the publisher’s scope. It does not transfer governance, registry, assurance, or legal authority to ᚲ.com. The source remains external; this page is a knowledge record and revalidation log.

Exact source-section claims

Each proposition has a stable ID, status, scope, owning route, evidence relationship, currentness qualification, correction state, and synchronized JSON record. Record completeness does not make the proposition true.

DoD Directive 3000.09 — Autonomy in Weapon Systems — Policy 1.2(a)-(b)

Autonomous and semi-autonomous weapon systems must allow appropriate human judgment over force and undergo rigorous verification, validation, testing, cybersecurity, and lawful use.

Qualification: Official publication establishes the source text and status within scope; it does not automatically prove effectiveness, deployment, mission authority, or every external fact.

Support relationship

DoD Directive 3000.09 — Autonomy in Weapon Systems — Responsibilities and testing

The directive assigns approval, legal review, test, monitoring, operator understanding, abort, and post-fielding responsibilities.

Qualification: Official publication establishes the source text and status within scope; it does not automatically prove effectiveness, deployment, mission authority, or every external fact.

Support relationship