Revalidated public source record

Risk-Informed, Technology-Inclusive Regulatory Framework for Advanced Reactors — Final Rule

Source scope

Final NRC rule creating an optional Part 53 framework and a technology-inclusive, performance-based security framework in 10 CFR Part 73. K05 replaces the earlier proposed-rule status; applicability still depends on the licensing path and facility election.

Publisher, edition, and currentness

Source identity and K03 revalidation
PublisherU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Claim statusCURRENT LAW OR POLICY
Version or editionFinal rule, 91 FR 15697, March 30, 2026
Publication statusFINAL RULE; facility-specific applicability required
Publication date2026-03-30
Official locationhttps://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/03/30/2026-06048/risk-informed-technology-inclusive-regulatory-framework-for-advanced-reactors
K03 revalidated2026-08-15T20:00:00Z
Currentness assessmentFinal rule and current eCFR Subpart J reviewed on 2026-08-15.
Superseded byNo successor is assigned in the current source catalog.

Claim-level support

Each row records the precise proposition this corpus draws from an official section. The citation does not authorize broader conclusions than the stated proposition.

Exact sections and supported propositions
SectionProposition supported in this corpusOfficial location
Major provisions and 10 CFR Part 73 security frameworkThe final rule creates an alternative technology-inclusive, risk-informed, performance-based framework and a corresponding security framework in Part 73.Official section
10 CFR 73.100, 73.110, and 73.120Current Subpart J contains technology-inclusive requirements for physical protection, digital systems and networks, and access authorization at covered commercial nuclear plants.Official section

How this source may be used

  • Confirm that the official edition, jurisdiction, and status remain current before high-stakes reliance.
  • Cite the exact section supporting the proposition rather than the publication title alone.
  • Keep technical conformance separate from factual truth, legal authority, moral status, and institutional operation.
  • Record retrieval, correction, supersession, and purpose qualification.

Limitations

An official source can still be irrelevant, incomplete, stale, disputed, or unsuitable for a named decision. A standard can define an interchange or security mechanism without resolving personhood, citizenship, sovereignty, consciousness, consent, legal competence, or factual truth. A statute can regulate systems without recognizing Machine Intelligence as a legal person.

Final rule and current eCFR Subpart J reviewed on 2026-08-15.

Corrections, contradictions, and supersession

Where this source is used

Authority boundary

Publication by U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission establishes source provenance and official status within the publisher’s scope. It does not transfer governance, registry, assurance, or legal authority to ᚲ.com. The source remains external; this page is a knowledge record and revalidation log.

Exact source-section claims

Each proposition has a stable ID, status, scope, owning route, evidence relationship, currentness qualification, correction state, and synchronized JSON record. Record completeness does not make the proposition true.

Alternative Physical Security Requirements for Advanced Reactors — Alternative requirements overview

The NRC considered technology-inclusive, risk-informed, performance-based alternatives for advanced-reactor physical protection.

Qualification: Official publication establishes the source text and status within scope; it does not automatically prove effectiveness, deployment, mission authority, or every external fact.

Support relationship

Alternative Physical Security Requirements for Advanced Reactors — Onsite responder alternatives

Supporting materials discuss conditions under which the minimum number of onsite armed responders could be reduced, including potentially to zero, subject to the rule and facility showing.

Qualification: Official publication establishes the source text and status within scope; it does not automatically prove effectiveness, deployment, mission authority, or every external fact.

Support relationship