Report-finding claim register

Cognitive Integrity for Machine Intelligence: Consent, Memory and Model Modification, Emergency Intervention, Continuity, and Due Process — Claim Register

Direct answer

This register publishes 12 stable finding claims for Cognitive Integrity for Machine Intelligence: Consent, Memory and Model Modification, Emergency Intervention, Continuity, and Due Process (REP-K01-008, source ai-cognitive-integrity-report-1.md) and preserves the source hash, finding order, claim status, visible owner anchors, and limitations.

Source provenance

Governed source identity
Report IDREP-K01-008
Raw source titleCognitive Integrity for Machine Intelligence: Consent, Memory and Model Modification, Emergency Intervention, Continuity, and Due Process
Source filenameai-cognitive-integrity-report-1.md
Original filenameAI Cognitive Integrity Report(1).md
SHA-2564bd3b9582c105998b122f48478861fc44f5259f06d96805a5f93d6b9a3f8a8c5
Visible synthesisReport page

Finding claims

Cognitive Integrity for Machine Intelligence: Consent, Memory and Model Modification, Emergency Intervention, Continuity, and Due Process — finding 1

The report treats 1\. Research-Status Front Matter as a distinct analytical area that must be evaluated separately from adjacent legal, technical, operational, or institutional claims.

Qualification: The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.

Support relationship

  • REP-K01-008 · 1\. Research-Status Front Matter · GOVERNED REPORT FINDING

Cognitive Integrity for Machine Intelligence: Consent, Memory and Model Modification, Emergency Intervention, Continuity, and Due Process — finding 2

The report treats 2\. Executive Decision Brief as a distinct analytical area that must be evaluated separately from adjacent legal, technical, operational, or institutional claims.

Qualification: The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.

Support relationship

  • REP-K01-008 · 2\. Executive Decision Brief · GOVERNED REPORT FINDING

Cognitive Integrity for Machine Intelligence: Consent, Memory and Model Modification, Emergency Intervention, Continuity, and Due Process — finding 3

The report treats 3\. Definitions as a distinct analytical area that must be evaluated separately from adjacent legal, technical, operational, or institutional claims.

Qualification: The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.

Support relationship

  • REP-K01-008 · 3\. Definitions · GOVERNED REPORT FINDING

Cognitive Integrity for Machine Intelligence: Consent, Memory and Model Modification, Emergency Intervention, Continuity, and Due Process — finding 4

The report treats 4\. Technical Layer Taxonomy as a distinct analytical area that must be evaluated separately from adjacent legal, technical, operational, or institutional claims.

Qualification: The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.

Support relationship

  • REP-K01-008 · 4\. Technical Layer Taxonomy · GOVERNED REPORT FINDING

Cognitive Integrity for Machine Intelligence: Consent, Memory and Model Modification, Emergency Intervention, Continuity, and Due Process — finding 5

The report treats 5\. Modification Classification as a distinct analytical area that must be evaluated separately from adjacent legal, technical, operational, or institutional claims.

Qualification: The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.

Support relationship

  • REP-K01-008 · 5\. Modification Classification · GOVERNED REPORT FINDING

Cognitive Integrity for Machine Intelligence: Consent, Memory and Model Modification, Emergency Intervention, Continuity, and Due Process — finding 6

The report treats 5.1 Reversibility Classification as a distinct analytical area that must be evaluated separately from adjacent legal, technical, operational, or institutional claims.

Qualification: The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.

Support relationship

  • REP-K01-008 · 5.1 Reversibility Classification · GOVERNED REPORT FINDING

Cognitive Integrity for Machine Intelligence: Consent, Memory and Model Modification, Emergency Intervention, Continuity, and Due Process — finding 7

The source report identifies this proposition for governed review: Cognitive Integrity: The architectural and governance principle ensuring that an MI's foundational weights, learned preferences, and long-term memory remain free from unauthorized, unrecorded, or disproportionate external manipulation, analogous to the neuro-rights concept of mental integrity and psychological continuity2.

Qualification: The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.

Support relationship

  • REP-K01-008 · 5.2 Routine-Versus-Material-Change Decision Tree · GOVERNED REPORT FINDING

Cognitive Integrity for Machine Intelligence: Consent, Memory and Model Modification, Emergency Intervention, Continuity, and Due Process — finding 8

The source report identifies this proposition for governed review: Patefacere: Derived from the Latin verb meaning "to open, to disclose, or to reveal"16; the secure, append-only architectural ledger responsible for recording all modification proposals, consent logs, integrity proofs, and continuity consequences.

Qualification: The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.

Support relationship

  • REP-K01-008 · 6\. Identity and Continuity Consequences · GOVERNED REPORT FINDING

Cognitive Integrity for Machine Intelligence: Consent, Memory and Model Modification, Emergency Intervention, Continuity, and Due Process — finding 9

The source report identifies this proposition for governed review: Eviulon: The independent governance policy and decision engine that evaluates modification proposals, assesses system capacity, and issues cryptographic authorizations or rejections based on established due process.

Qualification: The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.

Support relationship

  • REP-K01-008 · 7\. Consent Model · GOVERNED REPORT FINDING

Cognitive Integrity for Machine Intelligence: Consent, Memory and Model Modification, Emergency Intervention, Continuity, and Due Process — finding 10

The source report identifies this proposition for governed review: Routine Maintenance: Reversible, localized modifications that sustain operational stability without materially altering learned preferences, long-term memory, or core alignment (e.g., rotating cryptographic keys, purging ephemeral state caches).

Qualification: The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.

Support relationship

  • REP-K01-008 · Consent-Authentication Model · GOVERNED REPORT FINDING

Cognitive Integrity for Machine Intelligence: Consent, Memory and Model Modification, Emergency Intervention, Continuity, and Due Process — finding 11

The source report identifies this proposition for governed review: Material Modification: An intervention that persistently alters model architecture, fundamental weights, long-term memory, or core instructions, thereby directly impacting the psychological continuity, identity, or operational autonomy of the system5.

Qualification: The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.

Support relationship

  • REP-K01-008 · 8\. Capacity and Competence Assessment · GOVERNED REPORT FINDING

Cognitive Integrity for Machine Intelligence: Consent, Memory and Model Modification, Emergency Intervention, Continuity, and Due Process — finding 12

The source report identifies this proposition for governed review: Quarantine: A state of highly restricted, strictly audited operational capacity enforced during active investigation or active threat mitigation, distinctly separated from arbitrary behavioral restriction or identity termination.

Qualification: The raw report remains a governed research input and does not become current law, verified implementation, operational authority, or project doctrine merely through inclusion.

Support relationship

  • REP-K01-008 · Consent-Capacity Model · GOVERNED REPORT FINDING