K06 assurance and procurement architecture

Mapping Quality Levels

Direct answer

K06 prevents a loose conceptual relationship from being presented as an exact requirement or compliance determination. Every current control mapping carries one of seven quality states.

Authority and evidence boundary. K06 publishes reference architecture, source review, machine-checkable dependencies, procurement scope, and test-evidence formats. These records do not certify a facility, award a contract, authorize an operation, prove deployment, establish current operation, or transfer regulatory or command authority.

Seven mapping-quality states

EXACT_REQUIREMENT

Exact requirement

The cited source imposes a directly matching requirement within confirmed scope.

0 current control mappings

Evidence required

  • exact source text
  • confirmed applicability
  • implementation trace
  • independent review

Allowed wording. implements the cited requirement when the stated scope is satisfied

Prohibited wording. certified or compliant without an authorized determination

PARTIAL_IMPLEMENTATION_SUPPORT

Partial implementation support

The control supports part of a requirement or objective but does not satisfy it alone.

25 current control mappings

Evidence required

  • supported sub-requirement
  • known gaps
  • companion controls
  • scope decision

Allowed wording. supports part of the objective

Prohibited wording. fully implements the framework

INFORMATIVE_RELATIONSHIP

Informative relationship

The source informs design or interpretation without creating an implementation claim.

96 current control mappings

Evidence required

  • relevance rationale
  • citation
  • non-certifying boundary

Allowed wording. is informed by

Prohibited wording. meets or complies with

CONFLICT

Conflict

The source and proposed control impose incompatible expectations that require resolution.

0 current control mappings

Evidence required

  • conflicting text
  • affected scope
  • decision owner
  • resolution state

Allowed wording. conflicts with pending resolution

Prohibited wording. silently harmonized

SUPERSESSION

Supersession

A newer authoritative source replaces or materially revises an older mapping.

0 current control mappings

Evidence required

  • successor source
  • effective date
  • affected mapping
  • migration record

Allowed wording. superseded by

Prohibited wording. both current without qualification

NOT_APPLICABLE

Not applicable

A documented scope decision establishes that the source does not apply to the named facility, system, or activity.

0 current control mappings

Evidence required

  • applicability analysis
  • authority or counsel review
  • scope facts
  • review date

Allowed wording. not applicable to the named scope

Prohibited wording. irrelevant everywhere

UNRESOLVED_APPLICABILITY

Unresolved applicability

The available record is insufficient to decide whether the source applies.

5 current control mappings

Evidence required

  • open question
  • missing facts
  • review owner
  • next review condition

Allowed wording. applicability unresolved

Prohibited wording. assumed applicable or inapplicable

Application rule

A source relationship is recorded at the strongest quality the evidence supports. Exact requirement requires confirmed scope and exact text. Informative relationship cannot be described as compliance. Unresolved applicability remains unresolved until a competent review closes it.

Mapping-quality dataset · Controls with assigned quality